Related Items
-
Fair Justice for All? The Response of the Criminal Justice System to the Bradford Disturbances of July 2001 read more.
-
Mediating Criminal Domestic Violence Cases: How much is too much violence? read more.
-
Ministry of Justice Evaluation: Restorative justice: the views of victims and offenders read more.
-
A report commissioned by HMP Cardiff. Funded by The Home Office Crime Reduction Unit for Wales. read more.
-
Ministry of Justice Evaluation: Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes read more.
-
Restorative Practices in Three Scottish Councils: Final Report of the Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Pilot Projects 2004-2006 (2008) read more.
-
Ministry of Justice evaluation of restorative justice read more.
-
Restorative Justice: The evidence - Professor Lawrence Sherman and Dr Heather Strang read more.
- View all Research
Ministry of Justice Evaluation: Restorative justice in practice – findings from the second phase of the evaluation of three schemes
This is the second report of the Home office funded pilot studies.
Key points
The three schemes were generally well implemented; 342 Justice Research Consortium (JRC) cases reached the conference stage; and 50 CONNECT cases and 132 REMEDI cases reached mediation. Though most cases involved adult offenders, victims were pre p a red to p a rticipate. Victim participation was very high where cases involved young off e n d e r s .
W h e re participants were given a choice of restorative justice event, indirect mediation was m o re commonly chosen than direct mediation or conferencing. However, restricting the choice to a direct meeting with the offender did not reduce participation rates.
In conferences and direct mediations key participants spoke for relatively equal pro p o rtions of time. Though emotion was shown in conferences, they were conducted safely, with little a g g ression. Facilitators were rated by observers as impartial and not dominant.
O ffenders admitted a lot or quite a lot of responsibility for the offence in 60% of the 217 JRC c o n f e rences observed, with 11% admitting only a little or no re s p o n s i b i l i t y. There was censuring of the offence by participants, but also support for the off e n d e r, though little was said about reintegration into the community.
JRC conferences involved discussion about outcomes and the future, but this was less common in direct or indirect mediation. Outcome agreements focused on rehabilitation for offenders.
There was some formal monitoring of outcome agreements by JRC (though not by the other two schemes), with 36% of JRC agreements fully completed and 52% partially completed by the end of the funding period.
Further Reading
-
Ministry of Justice evaluation of restorative justice
..
-
Ministry of Justice Evaluation: Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes
Shapland, J et al (2008) Restorative Justice: Does Restorative Justice affect reconviction. Th ..
-
Ministry of Justice Evaluation: Restorative justice: the views of victims and offenders
..
-
Implementing restorative justice schemes
Implementing restorative justice schemes (Crime Reduction Programme): A report on the first ye ..
